Call for input: OHCHR Online Survey on “Civil Society Space”
Issued by
OHCHR
Published
01 September 2026
presented to
Human Rights Council at its sixty-third regular session
Issued by
OHCHR
Published
01 September 2026
presented to
Human Rights Council at its sixty-third regular session
Issued by Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights
Subject
Civic space
Symbol Number
A/HRC/63/53
To prepare the report, OHCHR conducted an online survey during February-March 2026, to which responses were received from 16 Member States, 14 national human rights institutions, and over 240 civil society and other actors. The online survey was also complemented by desk research and targeted consultations with civil society.
States highlighted a range of good practices to create and sustain an enabling environment for civil society. These included institutionalized public participation mechanisms such as citizens’ assemblies, parliamentary networks, public consultations, electronic petition systems and participatory governance platforms; stronger transparency and access-to-information frameworks with independent review and digital monitoring systems; protection measures for journalists and human rights defenders, including relocation schemes, protection mechanisms, legal safeguards and reporting systems; and practical support for civil society through flexible, multi-year funding, direct grants, tax incentives and structured engagement channels. Collectively, these practices seek to make decision-making more participatory, transparent, safe and accessible while strengthening the sustainability and independence of civil society actors.
Civil society organizations and national human rights institutions reported a broad deterioration of civic space characterized by shrinking freedoms, increasing criminalization and securitization of civic action, restrictive administrative and funding measures, growing digital surveillance and online repression, stigmatization of civil society actors, and rising barriers to meaningful participation. They highlighted the cumulative impact of restrictive laws, burdensome registration and reporting requirements, “foreign agent” frameworks, funding cuts, surveillance technologies, disinformation, crackdowns on protests, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs), and transnational repression, all of which contribute to self-censorship, weakened civil society sustainability, and reduced public influence over decision-making processes. Globally, between 2015 and 2025, at least 5,995 human rights defenders, journalists, and trade unionists were killed or subjected to enforced disappearance. Collectively, these trends and restrictions, both online and offline, create a chilling effect!
All responses to the online survey are acknowledged with gratitude! The following Member States, national human rights institutions, international and regional organizations, and civil society organizations have contributed to the report
The below list includes the contributions by international and regional NGOs. In addition, numerous responses were received from individuals and local and national civil society organizations from all regions. We would like to warmly thank all contributors.