Press releases Special Procedures
Serbia: Use of spyware against opposition and dissenting voices affects elections quality, warn UN experts
15 September 2026
GENEVA – UN experts* today expressed grave concern over the recurrent use of spyware and other digitally enabled surveillance in Serbia surrounding elections and protests, and called on the Government to uphold democratic integrity, safeguard civic space, and immediately cease the criminalisation of political dissent.
“This pattern is especially alarming as anticipated parliamentary elections are approaching,” the experts said. Parliamentary elections have officially been called for 25 October 2026. Serbia must ensure a safe, enabling and conducive environment in which civil society organisations, including election observers, journalists, students and human rights defenders can exercise their rights without fear of surveillance, intimidation or reprisals.
Weeks ago, several student movement members and opposition politicians allegedly received phone warnings indicating that they were targeted by a spyware attack. Technical reviews confirmed infections containing traces of a new version of NoviSpy, a spyware reported in use since 2013 against journalists and activists. The experts noted that worrisome harassment against civil society actors, including election observers, and human rights defenders had been previously reported. Such practices jeopardise the ability of different actors to monitor, document and report on human rights concerns, and contribute to public debate and electoral accountability.
They stressed that the deployment of spyware and communications interception threatens the rights to freedom of peaceful assembly, association, expression, privacy and political participation, and undermines the right of individuals and groups to promote and protect human rights. Before an election, it discourages participation in political assemblies and civil society campaign activities. During the election, it may influence voter turnout. After an election, it may enable reprisals against dissenting voices.
The experts have consistently reported on alleged human rights violations surrounding protests in Serbia. They noted actions undermining the right to education, freedom of peaceful assembly and association, freedom of expression, including alleged pressure on media freedom, as well as threats and attacks against journalists and media workers, the right to participate in public affairs, and the right to privacy, particularly affecting students, academic staff, as well as academic freedom and university autonomy.
The experts warned that civil society organisations, student activists, human rights defenders, opposition leaders, and journalists face online and offline surveillance, including spyware deployment — allegedly installed covertly during police interviews or arbitrary detentions linked to peaceful protests — alongside cyber-attacks, smear campaigns, and physical harassment.
“Spyware technologies are inherently incompatible with human rights, and their use and transfer must be prohibited.”
The experts said that the use of surveillance tools against dissent and opposition, including the NSO Group’s Pegasus and domestically developed Android system known as NoviSpy, and Cellebrite’s UFED forensics tools, alongside recent allegations, confirms a pattern of unlawful surveillance and intimidation aimed at activism and dissent.
“Uncertainty surrounding the use of digital technology in the context of elections fosters a climate of fear and creates a profound chilling effect for democratic participation,” the experts said.
“Without full respect for freedoms of assembly, association and expression before, during and after elections, the electoral process cannot be considered free and fair.”
*The experts:
- Gina Romero, the Special Rapporteur on the rights to freedom of peaceful assembly and of association
- Leopoldo Maldonado Gutiérrez, the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression
- Farida Shaheed, the Special Rapporteur on the right to education
- Andrea Bolaños Vargas, the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights defenders
- Ana Brian Nougrères, the Special Rapporteur on the right to privacy
Special Rapporteurs/Independent Experts/Working Groups are independent human rights experts appointed by the United Nations Human Rights Council. Together, these experts are referred to as the Special Procedures of the Human Rights Council. Special Procedures experts work on a voluntary basis; they are not UN staff and do not receive a salary for their work. While the UN Human Rights office acts as the secretariat for Special Procedures, the experts serve in their individual capacity and are independent from any government or organisation, including OHCHR and the UN. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the UN or OHCHR.
Country-specific observations and recommendations by the UN human rights mechanisms, including the special procedures, the treaty bodies and the Universal Periodic Review, can be found on the Universal Human Rights Index https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/.
UN Human Rights, country page – Serbia.
For inquiries and media requests, please contact: hrc-sr-freeassembly@un.org
For media inquiries related to other UN independent experts, please contact Maya Derouaz (maya.derouaz@un.org) or Dharisha Indraguptha (dharisha.indraguptha@un.org).
Follow news related to the UN’s independent human rights experts on X: @UN_SPExperts.