Skip to main content

More than GDP: Measuring what really matters for people and rights

21 October 2025

A female vendor sits beside a weighing scale in a Vietnamese market.
© Unsplash/Mana Amir

The international community has long acknowledged that Gross Domestic Product (GDP), the main measure of economic progress, ignores human rights and inequality. It fails to account for exploitative practices, unpaid care work, environmental damage, or whether growth benefits are fairly shared and lead to better health, education, social protection, or decent jobs.

Momentum to move beyond GDP as the leading measure of progress has accelerated in recent years, following the Pact for the Future’s mandate to establish a high-level expert group (HLEG) and an intergovernmental process tasked with agreeing on a set of measures of progress on sustainable development that complement and go beyond GDP.

Against this backdrop, UN Human Rights recently hosted the Expert Roundtable on Beyond GDP and Human Rights in Geneva, Switzerland, bringing together Member States, prominent academics, civil society, statisticians, economists and members of the High-Level Expert Group appointed by the Secretary-General, to explore how human rights indicators can shape metrics beyond GDP.

The event was co-organized with UNCTAD, UNRISD, the UNOG Beyond Lab, the UN Special Rapporteur on Extreme Poverty, and it was co-sponsored by Chile, Honduras, Mexico and Spain as well as by the Global Initiative on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (GI-ESCR).

The roundtable took place amid growing interest in the human rights economy, an approach that places human rights at the centre of economic policies and practices, eliminating discrimination, empowering marginalized groups, and reducing inequalities.

Linking new measures of progress with human rights

One of the strongest messages from the roundtable was that new measurement frameworks such as those on well-being, which can be defined in many ways, need to be based on internationally recognized human rights standards.

“Human rights can serve not only as a moral compass, but they are actionable tools grounded in universally agreed legal obligations,” said Nada Al-Nashif, UN Deputy High Commissioner for Human Rights. “They are critical to strengthen the accountability, coherence, and legitimacy of beyond GDP metrics.”

Discussions emphasized that these efforts are not starting from scratch. States already use universally applicable human rights indicators to assess adequate living standards, working conditions, the environmental cost of economic activity — all central to measuring how fair and equitable an economy is for people and the planet.

Several participants, including HLEG member Leonard Wantchekon, highlighted the importance of also measuring public participation, where relevant indicators already exist, such as those used to track progress on SDG 16 and the protection of civic space.

The exclusion of unpaid care and support work from GDP, despite its profound impact on women’s lives and its contribution to national well-being, emerged as a key theme throughout the roundtable.

“We must confront the unequal distribution of unpaid care and support work and its far-reaching implications for life chances and choices,” said HLEG-member Naila Kabeer. “This should be a central challenge in any effort to move beyond GDP.”

Ambassador of Mexico, Francisca Méndez speaking at the Expert Roundtable on Beyond GDP and Human Rights, 8 October 2025, Geneva, Switzerland.

Ambassador of Mexico, Francisca Méndez speaking at the Expert Roundtable on Beyond GDP and Human Rights, 8 October 2025, Geneva, Switzerland. © Kristin Faessen/Beyond Lab

Bridging the gap

A second key takeaway was that the design of metrics beyond GDP is not just about improving measurements, but fundamentally about rethinking of what the economy is for.

As reminded by the Ambassador of Honduras, Marcela Arias Moncada, ministers of finance around the world make human rights decisions every day including through budget allocations, tax reforms, and investment strategies. Yet these decisions often remain invisible in GDP-focused approaches.

Participants called for new measurement frameworks to include human rights indicators related to fiscal policy, reflecting States’ legal duty to raise and maximize resources for health, education, and other economic, social, and cultural rights. Many underscored the importance of also integrating the right to development to capture cross-border human rights obligations and the impact of economic and climate decisions on other countries.

“

Human rights are not just abstract ideals — they are actionable tools.

“

PEGGY HICKS, DIRECTOR OF THE THEMATIC ENGAGEMENT, SPECIAL PROCEDURES AND RIGHT TO DEVELOPMENT DIVISION, OHCHR

The limitations of GDP as a measure of economic progress are especially felt by developing countries. Access to concessional development and climate finance is often restricted to low-income countries, excluding middle-income countries with high levels of poverty or vulnerability to climate change.

“For Small Island Developing States (SIDS) like The Bahamas, the promise of beyond GDP is more than a slogan, it’s a lifeline,” said Patricia Hermanns, Ambassador of The Bahamas.

Investing in inclusive and disaggregated data

Another central theme was the critical role of data, statistics, and indicators in building robust measurement frameworks that go beyond GDP and reflect human rights, sustainability, and equality.

New metrics should avoid past exclusions and reveal inequalities. To truly measure what matters and to ensure no one is left behind, there was broad agreement on the need to balance investment on economic data with greater focus on data disaggregation, training for statisticians, and stronger national statistical systems to reveal both horizontal and vertical inequalities.

Experts emphasized that the new framework should use innovative data sources and methods grounded in a human rights-based approach. This process should be inclusive, engaging civil society and disadvantaged groups such as Indigenous Peoples, who often bear the greatest costs of growth-driven economic policy choices.

Data creation and policymaking should prioritize young people to ensure that new frameworks reflect long-term sustainability and intergenerational justice. 

“

The conversation around beyond GDP is not just about improving growth metrics, it’s about fundamentally rethinking our economic system.

“

NADA AL-NASHIF, UN DEPUTY HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS

The roundtable stood out for the active participation of Member States, including Mexico, Morocco, the Philippines, and Honduras, who shared examples of national beyond GDP metrics. They highlighted how such metrics, often embedded in legislation, effectively guide policymakers in managing difficult trade-offs and ensuring more equitable and sustainable outcomes.

Many of the countries in attendance are also part of the Beyond GDP Global Alliance — a collaborative space launched at the Fourth Financing for Development Conference in Sevilla, Spain, to foster dialogue, coherence, and convergence across existing beyond GDP initiatives.

Responding to the guiding question of the final panel — why should this time be different? — HLEG-member Enrico Giovannini pointed to the presence of a clear political mandate.

“The Pact for the Future explicitly calls for moving beyond GDP,” he said. “The key message is that we must go beyond the purely economic dimension of well-being and consider the broader factors that make well-being equitable and sustainable.” 

VIEW THIS PAGE IN: