Good practices
Good practices of NHRI engagement throughout the UPR cycle
On 14 January 2026, a letter was sent to all A and B status National Human Rights Institutions requesting information on:
- Examples of good UPR-related practices during the 3rd and 4th UPR cycles, and
- Suggestions for innovations regarding NHRI engagement in the 5th cycle.
The call for input generated over 50 responses (see below), and based on which two reports were compiled: (1) Report - NHRI good practices, and (2) Report - NHRI & 5th UPR cycle.
The feedback received from NHRIs also allows for the selection of a few good, promising and innovative practices for inclusion in the UPR Knowledge Hub (https://knowledgegateway.ohchr.org/upr), mandated by Human Rights Council resolution 54/28. The sharing of such practices will promote peer learning and support amongst States and stakeholders.
Equally, the suggestions for the 5th cycle will enrich discussions in preparation for the new cycle, with a particular focus on improving implementation of UPR recommendations.
Received responses to the call for input
Armenia - Human Rights Defender
Australia - Australian Human Rights Commission
Azerbaijan - Human Rights Commissioner, Ombudsman
Bahrain - National Institution for Human Rights: Arabic version | English version
Belgium - The Federal Institute for the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights
Benin - Commission béninoise des droits de l’homme
Bosnia and Herzegovina - Institute of Human Rights Ombudsmen
Burundi - Commission nationale indépendante des droits de l’homme
Canada - Canadian Human Rights Commission
Chile - Instituto Nacional de Derechos Humanos
Colombia - Defensoría del Pueblo
Costa Rica - Defensoría de los Habitantes
Côte d’Ivoire - Conseil national des droits de l’Homme
Democratic Republic of the Congo - Commission nationale des droits de l’homme
Denmark - Danish Institute for Human Rights
Egypt - National Council for Human Rights
El Salvador - Procuraduría para la Defensa de los Derechos Humanos
Estonia - Chancellor of Justice
Ethiopia - Ethiopian Human Rights Commission
Gambia - National Human Rights Commission
Georgia - Public Defender’s Office
Ghana - Commission on Human Rights and Administrative Justice
Iraq - High Commission for Human Rights
Jordan - National Centre for Human Rights: Arabic version | English version
Kenya - Kenya National Commission on Human Rights
Liberia - Independent National Commission on Human Rights
Malawi - Malawi Human Rights Commission
Maldives - Human Rights Commission of the Maldives
Mauritius - Commission nationale des droits de l’homme
Mongolia - National Human Rights Commission of Mongolia
Morocco - Conseil national des droits de l’homme
Namibia - Office of the Ombudsman
New Zealand - Human Rights Commission
Nigeria - National Human Rights Commission
Oman - Oman Human Rights Commission
Philippines - Commission on Human Rights of the Philippines
Qatar - National Human Rights Committee: Arabic version | English version
Republic of Korea - National Human Rights Commission of Korea
Senegal - Comité sénégalais des droits de l’Homme
Slovenia - Human Rights Ombudsman
South Africa - South African Human Rights Commission
Sweden - Swedish Institute for Human Rights
Thailand - National Human Rights Commission of Thailand
Togo - Commission nationale des droits de l’homme
Uganda - Uganda Human Rights Commission
Ukraine - Ukrainian Parliament Commissioner for Human Rights
Uzbekistan - Commissioner for Human Rights of the Oliy Majlis of the Republic of Uzbekistan
Venezuela - Defensoría del Pueblo: English version | Spanish version
UN good practices: How the UPR supports sustainable development
As the third cycle of the Universal Periodic Review process has drawn to a close – maintaining 100% participation by States in the reviews, with the involvement of all branches of the Government at the highest level - we see great merit in launching this Repository of UN good practices on how the Universal Periodic Review process supports sustainable development.
As a living document, the Repository captures how the UPR has been able to advance the promotion and protection of human rights and to secure greater compliance, in law and in practice, with international human rights norms or with commitments made by States in UN and regional human rights mechanisms, in all regions of the world.
Over 60 experiences from across the UN system
Captured from over 60 experiences shared from across the UN system, key findings show that UNCTs and UN entities in all regions are supporting governments to engage throughout the UPR process and integrating the UPR into UN programming and planning in line with their specific mandates.
UPR recommendations are increasingly integrated and aligned in UN efforts at achieving the Agenda 2030 for sustainable development. The UPR has been essential to support dialogues and advocacy efforts by UNCTs and UN entities, as a practical problem-solving tool to address sensitive and priority development challenges, leading to concrete results.
Several aspects of the UPR have encouraged greater coordination, implementation and follow-up action within the structures of the State. Those include:
- The predictability of the UPR, with the calendar set well in advance, for a period of 4.5 years;
- The sovereign decisions made by States in front of their peers
- The information provided by the UN and other stakeholders for the reviews
- The tools developed as a result of the Secretary-General’s Call to Action for Human Rights – especially the UPR Practical Guidance [العربية | 中文 | English | Français | Русский | Español]
These aspects have also increasingly engendered the pro-active participation of local and regional governments, national human rights institutions and civil society, before, during, and after the reviews.
Role of UN system key as UPR 4th cycle focuses on implementation
The fourth cycle of the UPR focuses on enhanced implementation of recommendations received and accepted by the State. The role of Resident Coordinators and the entire UN System therefore becomes even more relevant in maximizing the use of this human rights mechanism as an entry point for national policies and action on human rights. We encourage colleagues across the UN system to take inspiration from this initial set of concrete, positive, national experiences.
(Foreword signed by OHCHR, UNDP and DCO)
Some UPR Good practices:
- Austria (video)
- Costa Rica (video)
- France (Presentation – French seminar)
- UNESCO: Good practices on freedom of expression
- Emerging UPR Good practices (Study)
- UPR Good Practices - A desk review
UPR good stories:
- Sierra Leone: UN Human Rights recommendations help lead to end of death penalty
- Mongolia: New law to protect human rights defenders